<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Hilary Sutcliffe&#039;s Blog</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.matterforall.org/blog/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.matterforall.org/blog</link>
	<description>This is a personal blog. It&#039;s about whatever gets me excited, winds me up or I need to get off my chest! I also want to use it to fulfill one of our aims which is to facilitate debate, so don&#039;t be shy about adding comments, supportive or critical or in general putting me right!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 29 Apr 2012 14:05:12 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Emerging tech regulation &#8211; the ‘Whack a rat’ model by Paul Woof</title>
		<link>http://www.matterforall.org/blog/2012/04/04/emerging-tech-regulation-the-whack-a-rat-model/comment-page-1/#comment-1541</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul Woof</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Apr 2012 14:05:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.matterforall.org/blog/?p=630#comment-1541</guid>
		<description>The game of whack-a-rat, like nearly all skill based fairground games, relies upon the over confidence of the player. Over confidence is a common characteristic and is even apparent in activities for which careful planning has supposedly been undertaken such as budget setting or starting a business. Faced with the coconut shy of life, humans are nearly always too confident.
 
There are ways to increase your chances of rat whacking. I once enjoyed using such a stall as a source of funds at a scout fair. Here are my tips and how they apply to risk monitoring.
 
Firstly, when whacking the rat there is not enough time to raise and lower the bat. The bat must be held up so that it only needs to drop onto the rat. This reduces the time taken to skrike a blow considerably.
 
So institutions for risk control and methods to control risk should be established in advance so they are easily and quickly triggered.
 
The bat should not be held too high and the blow needs to be fast but not necessarily powerful.
 
So there is no need for overkill just sufficient effort to succeed.
 
As time passed my skill increased and the stall holders considered banning me but instead a greater effort was made to disguise the timing of the release and to vary the speed of the rat.
 
So, if you are too successful the insiders will try to change the game.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The game of whack-a-rat, like nearly all skill based fairground games, relies upon the over confidence of the player. Over confidence is a common characteristic and is even apparent in activities for which careful planning has supposedly been undertaken such as budget setting or starting a business. Faced with the coconut shy of life, humans are nearly always too confident.</p>
<p>There are ways to increase your chances of rat whacking. I once enjoyed using such a stall as a source of funds at a scout fair. Here are my tips and how they apply to risk monitoring.</p>
<p>Firstly, when whacking the rat there is not enough time to raise and lower the bat. The bat must be held up so that it only needs to drop onto the rat. This reduces the time taken to skrike a blow considerably.</p>
<p>So institutions for risk control and methods to control risk should be established in advance so they are easily and quickly triggered.</p>
<p>The bat should not be held too high and the blow needs to be fast but not necessarily powerful.</p>
<p>So there is no need for overkill just sufficient effort to succeed.</p>
<p>As time passed my skill increased and the stall holders considered banning me but instead a greater effort was made to disguise the timing of the release and to vary the speed of the rat.</p>
<p>So, if you are too successful the insiders will try to change the game.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Guest Blog from John Elkington by Why agitators and innovators must move with the time &#124; marketspace</title>
		<link>http://www.matterforall.org/blog/2012/02/14/guest-blog-from-john-elkington/comment-page-1/#comment-1515</link>
		<dc:creator>Why agitators and innovators must move with the time &#124; marketspace</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Apr 2012 12:48:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.matterforall.org/blog/?p=573#comment-1515</guid>
		<description>[...] alongside innovators, entrepreneurs and investors driving the evolution of technologies such as nanotechnology, synthetic biology and geoengineering, rather than simply trying to hamstring [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] alongside innovators, entrepreneurs and investors driving the evolution of technologies such as nanotechnology, synthetic biology and geoengineering, rather than simply trying to hamstring [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Which &#8216;doors of science are best left closed&#8217;? by Hilary</title>
		<link>http://www.matterforall.org/blog/2011/06/29/which-doors-of-science-are-best-left-closed/comment-page-1/#comment-1511</link>
		<dc:creator>Hilary</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Apr 2012 07:36:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.matterforall.org/blog/?p=293#comment-1511</guid>
		<description>This subject was revisited on Tuesday 3 April 2011 at our event on Responsible Innovation.  There was a view, expressed since in emails to me, that doors pretty much aren&#039;t ever closed.  

I was also watching BBC Horizon on Artificial Intelligence last night, seeing all the scientists very excited about the possibilities and wondering what doors should be left closed in that realm, if any?  Personally, I like the idea of robots cleaning my house, but am less keen on them making up their own language I don&#039;t understand and talking to each other in it!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This subject was revisited on Tuesday 3 April 2011 at our event on Responsible Innovation.  There was a view, expressed since in emails to me, that doors pretty much aren&#8217;t ever closed.  </p>
<p>I was also watching BBC Horizon on Artificial Intelligence last night, seeing all the scientists very excited about the possibilities and wondering what doors should be left closed in that realm, if any?  Personally, I like the idea of robots cleaning my house, but am less keen on them making up their own language I don&#8217;t understand and talking to each other in it!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Leaving Home 2025 &#8211; Short Story for FutureScapes competition by Hilary</title>
		<link>http://www.matterforall.org/blog/2012/02/29/leaving-home-2025-short-story-draft-for-futurescapes-competition/comment-page-1/#comment-1506</link>
		<dc:creator>Hilary</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Mar 2012 11:06:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.matterforall.org/blog/?p=586#comment-1506</guid>
		<description>Thanks Ruth!  Haven&#039;t read the winner yet, I wish they would have put the runners up there too.  Probably didn&#039;t want us all commenting they picked the wrong one!

But it was an interesting exercise to sort out what we really think would happen as opposed to the sci fi stuff we read about.  It was quite fun too, and yes, don&#039;t mean to be shallow, but rather fancy the stem cell treatment myself!!

Thanks again

Hilary</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks Ruth!  Haven&#8217;t read the winner yet, I wish they would have put the runners up there too.  Probably didn&#8217;t want us all commenting they picked the wrong one!</p>
<p>But it was an interesting exercise to sort out what we really think would happen as opposed to the sci fi stuff we read about.  It was quite fun too, and yes, don&#8217;t mean to be shallow, but rather fancy the stem cell treatment myself!!</p>
<p>Thanks again</p>
<p>Hilary</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Leaving Home 2025 &#8211; Short Story for FutureScapes competition by Ruth Livingstone</title>
		<link>http://www.matterforall.org/blog/2012/02/29/leaving-home-2025-short-story-draft-for-futurescapes-competition/comment-page-1/#comment-1505</link>
		<dc:creator>Ruth Livingstone</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Mar 2012 10:58:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.matterforall.org/blog/?p=586#comment-1505</guid>
		<description>Hi there and love your story! Squirrelling sounds great. And the stem cell beauty treatment sounds even better. I entered a story for the FutureScapes comp too, but didn&#039;t get anywhere. Mine involved an NHS computer deciding who gets treated and who doesn&#039;t. Anyway, nice to meet you.... Best wishes, Ruth</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi there and love your story! Squirrelling sounds great. And the stem cell beauty treatment sounds even better. I entered a story for the FutureScapes comp too, but didn&#8217;t get anywhere. Mine involved an NHS computer deciding who gets treated and who doesn&#8217;t. Anyway, nice to meet you&#8230;. Best wishes, Ruth</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Guest Blog from John Elkington by Why cleantech needs more than serendipity engines &#124; marketspace</title>
		<link>http://www.matterforall.org/blog/2012/02/14/guest-blog-from-john-elkington/comment-page-1/#comment-1494</link>
		<dc:creator>Why cleantech needs more than serendipity engines &#124; marketspace</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Mar 2012 19:32:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.matterforall.org/blog/?p=573#comment-1494</guid>
		<description>[...] My conclusion: in pushing towards our TEDxThames conference on Breakthrough Capitalism, we must focus both on incremental and transformative, systemic change – but with a focus on the latter. As I have argued elsewhere, it&#8217;s time to punctuate some equilibriums. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] My conclusion: in pushing towards our TEDxThames conference on Breakthrough Capitalism, we must focus both on incremental and transformative, systemic change – but with a focus on the latter. As I have argued elsewhere, it&#8217;s time to punctuate some equilibriums. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Nutters, Cassandras &amp; early warnings by You Can Lead a Politician To water, But You Can&#039;t Make Him Drink - Cientifica Ltd</title>
		<link>http://www.matterforall.org/blog/2011/10/12/nutters-cassandras-early-warnings/comment-page-1/#comment-1388</link>
		<dc:creator>You Can Lead a Politician To water, But You Can&#039;t Make Him Drink - Cientifica Ltd</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Feb 2012 14:49:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.matterforall.org/blog/?p=389#comment-1388</guid>
		<description>[...] of leaving the old ideas behind, here&#8217;s a great blog post by Hilary Sutcliffe asking whether &#8216;nutters&#8217; or those with extreme views have too much influence on [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] of leaving the old ideas behind, here&#8217;s a great blog post by Hilary Sutcliffe asking whether &#8216;nutters&#8217; or those with extreme views have too much influence on [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Views on Geoengineering cock up by Views on Geoengineering Cock up 2 &#8211; response to Nature article &#171; Hilary Sutcliffe&#039;s Blog</title>
		<link>http://www.matterforall.org/blog/2011/09/30/views-on-geoengineering-cock-up/comment-page-1/#comment-1239</link>
		<dc:creator>Views on Geoengineering Cock up 2 &#8211; response to Nature article &#171; Hilary Sutcliffe&#039;s Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Nov 2011 16:09:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.matterforall.org/blog/?p=378#comment-1239</guid>
		<description>[...] am actually still pretty happy with the conclusions mentioned in my original post called ‘Views on Geoengineering Cock Up’  and which are not a million miles away from their conclusions, but would like to make a few [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] am actually still pretty happy with the conclusions mentioned in my original post called ‘Views on Geoengineering Cock Up’  and which are not a million miles away from their conclusions, but would like to make a few [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The missing link:  The importance of ‘cogitation’ in stakeholder engagement by Hilary</title>
		<link>http://www.matterforall.org/blog/2011/11/15/the-missing-link-the-importance-of-%e2%80%98cogitation%e2%80%99-in-stakeholder-engagement/comment-page-1/#comment-1238</link>
		<dc:creator>Hilary</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Nov 2011 11:48:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.matterforall.org/blog/?p=484#comment-1238</guid>
		<description>Interesting observations in this post above - &#039;Public Engagement is dead&#039; from Bruce Etherington on what should public engagement be called. Lown</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting observations in this post above &#8211; &#8216;Public Engagement is dead&#8217; from Bruce Etherington on what should public engagement be called. Lown</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The missing link:  The importance of ‘cogitation’ in stakeholder engagement by Public engagement is dead, long live&#8230;what? &#171; Stories of science</title>
		<link>http://www.matterforall.org/blog/2011/11/15/the-missing-link-the-importance-of-%e2%80%98cogitation%e2%80%99-in-stakeholder-engagement/comment-page-1/#comment-1237</link>
		<dc:creator>Public engagement is dead, long live&#8230;what? &#171; Stories of science</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Nov 2011 10:59:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.matterforall.org/blog/?p=484#comment-1237</guid>
		<description>[...] Matter&#8217;s decision to add another element to the Public Engagement Triangle and calling it Cogitate. The Matter team decided not to call it reflect as it was too &#8220;passive, academic, [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Matter&#8217;s decision to add another element to the Public Engagement Triangle and calling it Cogitate. The Matter team decided not to call it reflect as it was too &#8220;passive, academic, [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

